Daisy Hospitals provides healthcare across several disciplines — Siddha, Ayurveda, Naturopathy and Homeopathy — and as it expanded across Tamil Nadu, patient records, consultations, laboratory reports, billing and inventory became harder to hold together.
The work was to centralise those records so a patient’s history is available wherever they are seen, and so management can see footfall, doctor performance and revenue across branches rather than one branch at a time.
Businesses running Odoo with OdooBots
Daisy Hospitals runs patient registration, consultation records, lab documentation, billing and inventory on one customised hospital management system across its branches. Patient information is collected once at registration; previous ailments, diagnoses and prescriptions are documented against the patient; lab and scan reports are stored with them; billing is automated with online payment; inventory is tracked by barcode; and follow-up reminders go out on a schedule rather than when someone remembers.
A multi-branch hospital’s hardest problem is not any single record — it is that the same patient exists in several places. Centralising the record is what makes everything downstream, from reporting to follow-up, possible.
Taken from the project itself rather than from a capability list.
A hospital management system to simplify the whole hospital process, covering appointments and patient records.
Customised hospital management system
Tamil Nadu, India
See every Odoo implementation case study, or the full Odoo ERP implementation service.
As branches opened across Tamil Nadu, managing patient footfall, doctor performance and revenue tracking became increasingly difficult. The hospital needed a customisable system able to centralise documentation across branches, track doctor performance and revenue, resolve data maintenance problems, monitor patient footfall and make patient reports easy to retrieve.
Documentation was maintained separately across locations, so a patient seen at two branches did not have one history.
Finding a previous lab result or scan report took time that belongs to patient care rather than to searching.
With revenue and consultations tracked separately, performance by doctor and by branch was not something management could simply read.
The billing process required manual effort at each step, which is slow at a counter and error-prone at month end.
Continuity of care relied on someone remembering to call, rather than on a scheduled reminder.
The implementation covered the administrative half of the hospital — the records, the money and the stock around clinical care.
Comprehensive patient information collected at registration and held as one record, so the same person is not re-created at each branch or each visit.
Previous ailments, current diagnoses and prescriptions documented and stored against each patient, available to whoever sees them next.
Laboratory results and scan reports stored and organised with the patient record rather than in a separate filing system.
Individual patient diets monitored and recorded, which matters in disciplines where diet is part of the treatment rather than adjacent to it.
The billing process automated end to end, with payment gateway integration so patients can settle bills online instead of only at a counter.
Barcode-based inventory tracking for accurate stock management, and regular follow-up notifications sent to patients for continuing care.
The hospital now works from one patient record across its branches, with billing, stock and follow-up running from the same system.
registration, consultations, lab results and diet notes sit together regardless of which branch the patient attends.
lab and scan documentation is stored with the patient, so a previous result is found in seconds.
the counter process is faster and patients can settle bills without attending.
accurate inventory with fewer shortages and less waste.
reminders go out automatically, which supports both continuity of care and retention.
What the client reports back, in their terms. We publish no percentages here because the project did not measure any, and a number we cannot stand behind is worth less than one we can.
Centralised data and efficient tracking simplified daily operations and reduced the administrative burden on staff.
Organised records and accessible lab results support faster, better-informed treatment decisions.
Automated billing and integrated payment improved cash flow and made financial tracking clearer.
Barcode-based tracking reduced stock shortages and waste.
Regular follow-up notifications maintain continuity of care, which supports both outcomes and retention.
Automating registration, billing and inventory freed staff time for patient care, and digital records reduced errors in patient information.
What this implementation used, written up properly.
If you run more than one branch, tell us how a patient record follows a patient today. That answer usually decides the whole project, and the diagnosis call is free.
